Eric's MLB Power Ratings
Home
Eric's MLB Power Ratings
2010 Season
FINAL
*Congratulations to the San Francisco Giants, winners of the 2010 World Series.
The rankings are based on three factors:
|
RATINGS PHILOSOPHY: |
|
|
|
|
-
Third, is Point Ratio or Power Rating--Scoring the most runs while allowing the fewest runs. Historically, teams that win by larger margins against their opponents. win more games than teams that win by smaller margins. |
- System PCT (Sys.Pct.)-A team's overall rating compared to the hypothetical 'average' team (.500).
|
Updated:
11/02/10
SOS-Strength of Schedule Rank, Off-Offensive Rank (runs scored), Def-Defensive/Pitching Rank (runs allowed), Power-Power Rank (see above).
*World Series Champions
|
Rank |
Team |
Div |
W-L Record |
SOS |
Offense |
Pitching |
Power |
Sys.Pct. |
|
1 |
Philadelphia |
NE |
102-69 |
6 |
7 |
3 |
3 |
.603 |
|
2 |
Tampa Bay |
AE |
98-69 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
1 |
.598 |
|
3 |
NYY |
AE |
100-71 |
5 |
1 |
12 |
2 |
.596 |
|
4 |
San Francisco |
NW |
103-74 |
12 |
17 |
1 |
4 |
.590 |
|
5 |
Minnesota |
AC |
94-71 |
19 |
6 |
9 |
7 |
.570 |
|
6 |
Atlanta |
NE |
92-74 |
15 |
13 |
4 |
5 |
.563 |
|
7 |
Boston |
AE |
89-73 |
3 |
2 |
20 |
10 |
.559 |
|
8 |
Texas |
AW |
98-80 |
14 |
4 |
10 |
6 |
.558 |
|
9 |
San Diego |
NW |
90-72 |
24 |
23 |
2 |
8 |
.554 |
|
10 |
Cincinnati |
NC |
91-74 |
30 |
9 |
15 |
11 |
.544 |
|
Rank
|
Team |
Div |
W-L Record |
SOS |
Offense |
Pitching |
Power |
Sys.Pct. |
|
11 |
Toronto |
AE |
85-77 |
1 |
5 |
16 |
13 |
.537 |
|
12 |
St. Louis |
NC |
86-76 |
29 |
16 |
8 |
9 |
.5324 |
|
13 |
CWS |
AC |
88-74 |
26 |
11 |
18 |
15 |
.5317 |
|
14 |
Colorado |
NW |
83-79 |
21 |
8 |
19 |
12 |
.520 |
|
15 |
Oakland |
AW |
81-81 |
20 |
22 |
5 |
14 |
.509 |
|
16 |
Florida |
NE |
80-82 |
8 |
14 |
17 |
16 |
.501 |
|
17 |
Detroit |
AC |
81-81 |
22 |
10 |
24 |
18 |
.498 |
|
18t |
NYM |
NE |
79-83 |
16 |
24 |
7 |
17 |
.4937 |
|
18t |
LAD |
NW |
80-82 |
10 |
20 |
11 |
20 |
.4937 |
|
20 |
LAA |
AW |
80-82 |
17 |
18 |
14 |
19 |
.492 |
|
Rank |
Team |
Div |
W-L Record |
SOS |
Offense |
Pitching |
Power |
Sys.Pct. |
|
21 |
Milwaukee |
NC |
77-85 |
28 |
12 |
27 |
21 |
.463 |
|
22 |
CHC |
NC |
75-87 |
27 |
21 |
26 |
23 |
.447 |
|
23 |
Houston |
NC |
76-86 |
23 |
28 |
21 |
26 |
.446 |
|
24 |
Washington |
NE |
69-93 |
18 |
25 |
22 |
22 |
.431 |
|
25 |
Cleveland |
AC |
69-93 |
9 |
26 |
23 |
24 |
.430 |
|
26 |
Arizona |
NW |
65-97 |
7 |
15 |
28 |
25 |
.414 |
|
27 |
Baltimore |
AE |
66-96 |
2 |
27 |
25 |
28 |
.411 |
|
28 |
Kansas City |
AC |
67-95 |
13 |
19 |
29 |
27 |
.409 |
|
29 |
Seattle |
AW |
61-101 |
11 |
30 |
13 |
29 |
.372 |
|
30 |
Pittsburgh |
NC |
57-105 |
25 |
29 |
30 |
30 |
.334 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank |
Division |
Win-Loss Records |
SOS |
Offense |
Pitching |
Power |
Sys.Pct. |
|
|
1 |
AE |
438-386 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
.540 |
|
|
2 |
NE |
422-401 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
.518 |
|
|
3 |
NW |
421-404 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
.514 |
|
|
4 |
AC |
399-414 |
5 |
2 |
5 |
5 |
.488 |
|
|
5 |
AW |
320-344 |
4 |
6 |
3 |
4 |
.483 |
|
|
6 |
NC |
462-513 |
6 |
5 |
6 |
6 |
.461 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are the owner of this site:
You can start editing your web site by clicking here.
Forgot your zoomshare username or password? Get it here.
|
